10/13/2021 0 Comments Best Gpu For 2010 Mac Pro
Most GPUs will work just fine. The other video cards above are compatible with the 'Early 2008' and 'Early 2009' as well as the 'Mid-2010' and 'Mid-2012' Mac Pro models.Answer (1 of 2): I have used several of those machines and installed several of them in studios with non-standard GPUs. Please note that the Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 only is compatible with the 'Mid-2010' and 'Mid-2012' Mac Pro models.The GeForce GT 650M is built into the 'mid 2012' Retina MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Quad-Core i7.I 'needed' the flashed video card when I routinely went back-and-forth between Win10 and macOS. R5770 AMD Radeon HD 5770 (1 power feed, 1G VRAM) GTX285 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 GPU (2 power feeds, 1G VRAM) Ten PCIe GPUs are installed in a 'mid 2010' Mac Pro 3.33GHz Hex-Core. It now has a normal (un-flashed) Radeon 5700 XT.GT650M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M GPU (built-in Retina MacBook Pro), 1G VRAM. It had been at High Sierra with a flashed Nvidia GTX 1070. The trick is getting the boot screen (little apple logo as.Just two days ago, I was able to get Catalina working in my 12-core 2010 Mac Pro.It should be here in a few weeks. The TDP of the 5700 XT is 225-watts, and therefore presents no special challenges to the factory power capabilities of the 5,1 Mac Pro.I also was not able to get the Solarflare 10GbE Ethernet card that had worked fine in High Sierra to work at all in Catalina, so I ordered an Aquantia AQC107-based card. It is technically possible to mine bitcoin on Mac or MacBook Pro these days however, it is no longer profitable.The PowerColor 5700 XT version that I have uses a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector, so you'll need mini-PCIe power cables of each. They are built well, and Mac OS is very intuitive and capable, but what you don’t hear Macs do is mine bitcoin.
Best Gpu For 2010 Pro Mac Pro Models![]() It now has a normal (un-flashed) Radeon 5700 XT.Just asking, how's 5700XT's performance in Resolve?So far, today has been a good day of testing:I edited a little of a project (two UHD H.264 100Mbps from Panasonic FZ1000/FZ2500) and ran a couple of exports and Geekbench 5 tests. It had been at High Sierra with a flashed Nvidia GTX 1070. Look here and check: So basically, I would be looking for a proper GPU and the 5.1 goes to 7.1 - well almost.MediaGary wrote:Just two days ago, I was able to get Catalina working in my 12-core 2010 Mac Pro. Plenty of people are doing it. This was impossible even a year ago, now it's possible. This has made me more confident. Therefore, concerns about the slow PCIe 2.0 connection of the 5700 XT in the 2010 Mac Pro isn't too much of an issue.EDIT: A PCIe 2.0 isn't a bottleneck compared to an eGPU connection over Thunderbolt-3, so there really shouldn't to much concern here in my 4k world of editing.Thank you for the help. That comes within 7-percent to the 60954 OpenCL shown by a Late 2019 MacBook Pro with the 8GB 5700XT upgrade. (.until Big Sur?)3- The Geekbench 5 Compute benchmark for the Radeon 5700 XT is 44940 in Metal and 56695 in OpenCL. Now the Aquantia-based card that I ordered is unnecessary. I'll reserve judgement until I replace the cache/stills 6Gbps SATA SSD drive with something faster.1- The Catalina macOS discovered the native WiFi of the 2010 Mac Pro and it works fine.2- When I used the Migration Assistant (MA) to move my apps from High Sierra to Catalina, the Solarflare 10GbE Ethernet came alive, even though I was unable to install it by conventional means before MA. Free terminal emulator program for macI am currently in High Sierra, and 5700XT won't work below Catalina as far as I understand. This has made me more confident. At the same time, 5700XT seems a good option as this does not require any outside power source.Can I migrate with MA from High Sierra to Catalina directly without the need to go to Mojave? To do that I'll probably need the original Mac Pro card 5870, right?Good to hear that 10GbE Ethernet and the wifi coming back this way.Krishna Pada wrote:Thank you for the help. Besg pdf utilities for the macThis will update the BootROM to 144.0.0.0. I made one for High Sierra (because my High Sierra was on HFS+).B- You'll need another 16GB USB flash drive to make the Catalina Patcher bootable USB drive following the instructions on [c- You may need an extra SSD (128GB will do) as a temporary installation target drive.D- Boot the High Sierra USB stick and follow the installation prompts that ensure you get to MP51.0089.B00E- Install High Sierra on the extra APFS-formatted SSD, and then download the Mojave Installer from AppleF- Start the Mojave Installation directly from within the extra SSD. As it turns out, the fact that the Nvidia card was a Web-Driver makes it Metal-compatible enough to get up from BootROM MP51.0089.B00 to 144.0.0.0.0.A- Use the 'createinstallmedia' process documented in the Apple Support site to create bootable 16GB USB flash drives. I might order the Titan Ridge again, but another side-effect of the Migration Assistant is that the Inateck KT4004 USB 3.0 adapter also now works, so the Titan Ridge requirement is less immediate.The four things that kept me stuck in getting from BootROM MP51.0084.B00 to MP51.0089.B00 and ultimately to 144.0.0.0.0 are:1-The attached display screen must *not* be a 4k-capable display2- All PCIe cards except the video card must be removed during the upgrade attempt3- The High Sierra partition *must* be APFS (not HFS+ as mine was)4- All drives except the one target installation SSD should be disconnected/removedAnother thing that kept me stuck was that I thought a Metal-compatible card meant that only AMD cards would work for upgrading to the Mojave-level 144.0.0.0.0 BootROM. I had even ordered a flashed Titan Ridge adapter, but returned it without opening the package when I got stuck in the 2010 Mac Pro firmware update process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJennifer ArchivesCategories |